Central banks across the globe are increasingly turning their attention to the rapidly growing field of tokenisation, as it promises to transform the way assets are managed, traded, and exchanged. While tokenisation offers the potential to unlock new efficiencies and enhance financial innovation, central banks are carefully evaluating the risks that could arise from its widespread adoption. These concerns range from regulatory challenges to systemic risks, and central banks are looking for ways to strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding financial stability.

What Is Tokenisation?

At its core, tokenisation involves converting physical assets—such as real estate, commodities, or financial securities—into digital tokens that can be bought, sold, and traded on blockchain or distributed ledger technology (DLT) platforms. These digital representations of assets allow for faster, more efficient transactions, offering greater transparency and reduced friction in the trading process.

In financial markets, tokenisation has gained significant attention due to its potential to make the transfer of ownership of securities, including bonds, stocks, and derivatives, simpler and more cost-effective. By breaking down large assets into fractionalised digital tokens, it can democratise access to investment opportunities and make it easier for investors to diversify their portfolios.

The Promise of Tokenisation: Efficiency and Innovation

The key benefits of tokenisation are clear. By leveraging blockchain technology, transactions can be executed almost instantaneously, and the need for intermediaries—such as clearinghouses, custodians, and settlement banks—can be reduced or eliminated entirely. This could lead to faster settlement times, reduced operational costs, and the opening up of new investment opportunities for a broader range of investors.

For businesses and financial institutions, tokenisation offers the potential for increased liquidity by allowing fractional ownership of assets. For instance, tokenised real estate allows smaller investors to gain exposure to properties without needing to purchase an entire building or commercial asset. This opens up the possibility of pooling assets from multiple investors, increasing the overall liquidity in the market.

In addition to financial products, tokenisation can also improve the transparency and traceability of assets. Because blockchain records all transactions on a distributed ledger, it is much harder for bad actors to manipulate records or obscure the true ownership of assets. This enhanced transparency could strengthen trust between market participants and reduce the opportunities for fraud.

Central Banks’ Concerns: Risk Management and Stability

Despite its potential, central banks are not without concerns when it comes to tokenisation. As the use of tokens expands, several risks could arise that may have broader implications for the financial system.

1. Regulatory Uncertainty
   One of the major concerns surrounding tokenisation is the lack of consistent and comprehensive regulation across jurisdictions. Financial markets are tightly regulated, and any new technology must fit within existing legal frameworks. However, the nature of tokenised assets—and the platforms that facilitate their exchange—raises complex regulatory issues. Central banks are worried about how to apply traditional regulations, such as those for securities, to assets that exist only in digital form.
2. Tokenisation could also pose challenges for anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) compliance. As tokens can be easily transferred across borders and transactions can occur anonymously, regulators are concerned about the ability to monitor and trace illicit activity. Central banks are keen to ensure that any tokenisation efforts do not create new avenues for financial crimes.
3. Systemic Risk and Financial Stability
   While tokenisation promises greater efficiency, it also introduces new risks that could impact the stability of the broader financial system. The growing use of tokenised assets could lead to increased interconnectedness between different market participants, which may create systemic risks. For example, if a key player in the tokenised market were to fail, it could trigger a chain reaction that affects other sectors of the economy. This interconnectedness, particularly if tokenised assets represent a large portion of traditional financial markets, could make the system more vulnerable to shocks.
4. Moreover, the volatility of tokenised assets—particularly those tied to cryptocurrencies—poses another risk. Cryptocurrencies and tokens are often subject to high volatility, which could lead to instability in markets and undermine investor confidence. Central banks are mindful that the speculative nature of some digital assets could increase the likelihood of market bubbles, leading to significant losses for investors and destabilising the financial system.
5. Cybersecurity Risks
   Another area of concern for central banks is the cybersecurity risks associated with tokenisation. Blockchain and DLT networks, while inherently secure, are still vulnerable to attacks, especially if platforms or exchanges handling tokenised assets are not properly secured. Hacks, data breaches, or system vulnerabilities could result in the loss of valuable assets or sensitive information, undermining trust in the entire system. Ensuring the cybersecurity of platforms and assets is paramount as tokenisation continues to grow in popularity.
6. Operational and Technological Barriers
   Tokenisation relies on sophisticated technology and infrastructure, including distributed ledgers and smart contracts, which are still developing. Central banks are cautious about the operational challenges associated with integrating these technologies into existing financial systems. For instance, there may be issues with scaling tokenisation technologies to handle large volumes of transactions in traditional markets, or compatibility challenges between different blockchain networks.
7. The financial industry’s reliance on legacy systems also presents a barrier to the widespread adoption of tokenisation. Ensuring interoperability between existing infrastructure and new tokenised platforms could require significant investment and innovation. Central banks must also consider the potential implications for monetary policy and financial surveillance as they work to accommodate these new technologies.

Steps Toward Regulatory Clarity

Recognising the importance of tokenisation, central banks are not ignoring the technology’s potential. Instead, they are actively working to understand and address the associated risks, while also developing a framework that encourages innovation in a controlled manner.

Some central banks have already begun developing pilot programmes and regulatory frameworks to explore the risks and benefits of tokenisation. For example, the Bank of England has been investigating the implications of tokenisation through its Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) programme. Other central banks, such as the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Reserve, have also initiated research into the use of tokenised assets within their economies, often as part of broader efforts to develop central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

These pilot programs aim to test tokenisation and blockchain in controlled environments, helping regulators better understand how these technologies interact with existing financial systems and how they can be safely regulated. The ultimate goal is to create a regulatory landscape that allows for innovation while minimizing risks to financial stability.

Tokenisation’s Future: A Balancing Act

The future of tokenisation will likely depend on how well central banks can balance its potential benefits with the need for adequate risk management. As the technology matures, central banks will need to work closely with financial institutions, technology providers, and regulators to create a robust framework that fosters innovation without jeopardising financial stability.

By establishing clear regulatory guidelines, improving transparency, and investing in new infrastructure, central banks can ensure that tokenisation does not disrupt financial markets but instead contributes to a more inclusive, efficient, and secure financial system. Tokenisation holds the promise of revolutionising asset ownership and trading, but only if its adoption is carefully managed to mitigate risks and safeguard the broader economy.

Conclusion: Proceeding with Caution

While tokenisation presents a compelling opportunity to modernise financial markets and introduce new efficiencies, central banks remain cautious in their approach. The potential risks, particularly in terms of regulatory uncertainty, financial stability, cybersecurity, and operational challenges, must be thoroughly understood and addressed.

As financial markets continue to explore the adoption of tokenisation, central banks are committed to ensuring that the technology evolves within a framework that supports long-term stability, trust, and integrity. By adopting a measured and cautious approach, central banks hope to harness the benefits of tokenisation while mitigating the risks associated with its widespread use.

‍